In my post The War of Genes: Fighting Devolution, I wrote about balancing out the gene pool by encouraging the smart to produce more than 1.5 children in the hopes that a small surge in intelligence alleles may minimally counteract the enormous frequency of stupid alleles being contributed on a daily basis. I specifically discounted sterilization because that would certainly bring up issues of eugenics. Mine was a fantasy war to outbreed the enemy. Interestingly, a State Representative in Louisiana wants to fight poverty — not stupidity — by offering voluntary sterilization of men and women for $1000.
John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, offers a brainstorm of sorts to stimulate debate on an issue unimproved by existing, conventional social programs.
He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men.
It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said…
LaBruzzo said other, mainstream strategies for attacking poverty, such as education reforms and programs informing people about family planning issues, have repeatedly failed to solve the problem. He said he is simply looking for new ways to address it.
First, a hearty bravo to LaBruzzo for stepping over the barriers of political correctness to offer a novel solution to a continuing problem, whether he is right or wrong. Let us remember that this is merely an idea thrown out into the public forum before throwing stones labeled with terms like racist or eugenics. (I’d like to throw some stones at all the devout Catholics who love unprotected premarital fornication too.) Voluntary is the key word in the article for all you low-SAT-verbal-score readers out there.
Second, an ah-ha moment. Why didn’t I think to offer a voluntary sterilization program in my fanciful war against stupidity? How brilliant. The dumb would certainly succumb for a few thousand dollars. In fact, for the cost of less than a Wall Street bailout, we could take a momentous step in ebbing the ineluctable process of human devolution.
Third, I particularly enjoyed reading the comments on Digg. Perhaps there is hope for this world after all.


Wow, I guess you got your wish. I can’t believe the bailout didn’t pass. You must be dancing. I heard the new County hospital hasn’t openned yet? That’s crazy. I was assured when I was interviewing 3 yrs ago that the hospital would be open by the time I started my internship. Friggin lying, shady ass chairman. What’s up with that.
Yes, I’m ecstatic. The bailout would have been a disaster. The markets are the way they are because these finance firms are holding out for a bailout. When they realize that no relief is coming, they will be forced to start facing the music and sell their shitty ass assets at whatever worthless prices at which they are truly valued. Secondly, whether right or wrong, the citizens of America have spoken. If there is one clear fact in this debacle, it is that no one but my god knows what is going to happen. From our idiot president to the Representatives and Senators to the PhD economists at Harvard to the farmers of the Iowa cornfields, no one can truthfully say that they can predict, with any certainly, what will happen with the global economy tomorrow. There are too many variables and too many unknowns. This fact is reflected in the fact that the bailout did not pass. Yes, today we had a huge drop in the Dow. Emotions. Not market. We won’t know the repercussions for months. However, good or bad, the people have chosen and the people will live by their decision.
You have a god? hahaha. I guess he doesn’t get as much respect as mine since he doesn’t get the capital G treatment.
How do you feel about undervolting your cpu in a laptop?